Up In the Air

Up In the Air - Photograph

Today is the last day of August, and I welcome September.  By this time every year, I am tired of the heat and humidity that Nebraska summers can bring.  As I mentioned last week, I am busy finishing up several projects, but I wanted to take a small moment for a little relaxation….

Do you remember when you were a kid and would lie on your back on a summer day looking at the clouds?  I wish I had more time to do that.  Instead, I take photos of clouds and post them and imagine myself relaxing in some nice soft grass with a cool breeze. 

Technical Details:
Canon G10, 6.1mm, f/2.8, 1/640 sec.
Douglas County, Nebraska

Some Mild Autofocus Humor for a Monday Morning

This was the explanation that Canon gave me when I sent my 17-40 f/4l in for repair:

What was improperly not functioning properly again?

Filed under: Musings | No Comments

Journey of Light 2010! (otherwise known as version 3.14159)

Many may have noticed for the past few weeks my blog articles have been sparser. Unfortunately, I wasn’t trialing the new Canon 60D or 8-15 Fisheye lens (Canon, you can always send new equipment to me to try!), I have been hard at work on several projects. Over the next few months I am going to share some of those projects with you, but today I announce that I am finished with one of the more major ones – a website overhaul. As part of this announcement I am going to provide a little insight into my design requirements and the history of my website.

First, a fun (and a little disturbing) look at the last 10 years of the Journey of Light Photography website. I hopped on the Wayback Machine (Internet Archive) as far as it would go to get some of these images.

Journey of Light - 2000

Egads! What was I thinking? This was my website design in 2000. Well, I guess navigation was easy, but all those frilly images probably took a long time to load on the dial-up connections of the day. I can understand why this was my look for only about 1 year. I bet it was well-optimized for Netscape though!  (The centered – black background – top menu look is oddly cyclical)

Ahh, the days of tabs. From 2001 until about 2003, my website sported tabs and my first little flash animation (that Journey of Light in the corner moved!). I will say that my website looked slightly better than this, the Internet Archive didn’t have all the data. It didn’t look much better, though!

From 2003 until 2005 my website design switched to the left-hand menu look at the time. Additionally, I put in a back-end XML framework which still exists, even on the new website (though modified). I also did fancy stuff like add-ins that automatically re-sized photographs and sorted things. Slow and ineffective.

Ahh, my 2006-2010 website. I did away with the fancy add-ons and went back to basics.  During the past four years it’s been viewed by roughly 110,000 unique visitors (give or take 10,000). Not bad, but it can be better. Out of a little sentimentality, but mainly because search engines still reference it and occasional returning visitors ask me to find something on the old site, I always leave the old structure up for 1-2 years. This site will remain, somewhat hidden, during that time.

Now, my requirements for my new and improved website.

As I mentioned, my previous design had the same format for roughly 4 years. In a world where people get a new cell phone every 3 months, my design was stale, but effective. During those years I will say that I continued to update the site, placing new photography out weekly and sometimes daily, adding e-commerce links, new pages, and search functionality. But, just like a house that gets addition after addition, after a while stuff tends to look tacked on and not part of the normal flow. As such my first design requirement was simplification.

In addition to adding pages, I spent a lot of time on optimizing the site for search engines. Since I am not Art Wolfe or Thomas Mangelsen, I can’t just sit back and let people search me by name. I wanted to retain the work I did on SEO, although there is always risk with any major change to a website. My second requirement was continued Search Engine likability.

Over time Internet speeds have generally increased, but not everyone has the fastest line and I want everyone to have a good experience. My third requirement was to maintain a fast loading time or to make it even faster.

About 3 years ago, I spent a lot of time making sure that my site was cross-browser compatible. It took some time, but I managed to get it looking the same between Internet Explorer, Firefox, and Safari. My forth requirement was good cross-browser compatibility.

Lastly, I wanted it easy to use. I’ve always tried to provide an intuitive site that could be accessible and easy to navigate. As my last website evolved, it became obvious from my web statistics that the advanced features such as search and keyword look up were not be utilized. My last requirement was to streamline this and to implement a search function that working like most of the search functions out there.

For the last few months I have been gathering ideas, looking at effective navigation, preparing code, and bugging my wife to put it through its paces (Thanks, Holly!).  I launch my new website, Journey of Light 2010
 

Filed under: Musings | 2 Comments

Photo Friday: Under Pinpoints of Light

Photograph: Under Pinpoints of Light

Today’s Photo Friday was captured last fall when I went out to Toadstool Geologic Park in western Nebraska.  Being as isolated as it is, it is a prime location for stargazing.  Of course, a night without a moon helps!

Technical Details:
Canon 5D Mark II, 17-40 f/4l @ 17mm, f/4, 2 exposure blend (1 taken just after sunset, 1 taken about 45 minutes after)
Toadstool Geologic Park, Nebraska

The “Self-Taught” Photographer Contradiction

Photograph - Quiet Surveyor 

Everyone is taught photography by others.  Consciously or unconsciously we receive the majority of our instruction from other artists, friends, instructors, etc.  In many photographer’s early careers, I find many resumes and statements that contain such phrases as ”completely self-taught” or “was not instructed”.  By these descriptions, the artist is trying to validate their perceived lack of formal credentials.  It is my experience, first, this is never true, and second, it doesn’t matter. 

In regard to the first point, the non-intentional lack of honesty inherent with being “self-taught”.  Most of the time someone chooses to become an artist because of inspiration they have received from seeing other’s work.  It is their wish to create something of similar beauty and if they continue to evolve, to improve upon the work with their own voice and style.  Photographers look at images from various sources, calendars, postcards, the Internet and then they attempt their own creations, initially by imitation.  In this manner they are being instructed by those disassociated slices of imagery.  If they find they are not successful in imitation, then they research how to achieve those results.  Often, they find their answers in books and the internet.  After the artist reaches the desired results, the next step is developing vision and style.  (Some artists never evolve past imitation) 

For those that have received formal instructrion, I submit that they may start with a disadvantage.  The student’s voice and style is heavily influenced by the instructor.  The instructor chooses the lectures, the example artists, the images.  While they maybe attempting to broaden the student’s understanding of the art, they may still be applying their vision on the students, albeit unconciously.  Additionally, the instructor maybe required to grade, therefore applying an objective rating to subjective material.  Thus, the evolution of the style of the student could be changed accordingly.  In this respect, photography instructors should be very careful on how they influence.

Now, in regard to the second point, it does not matter if one is “self-taught”.   If the art is good enough, fits the needed requirement, and is priced appropriately, no art buyer will turn down a piece simply because the artist was not formally instructed.  Now, if someone is trying to get into an agency, or get a position as a staff photographer, this may matter, but if your goal is to sell stock or prints then it is really not necessary to point out that you received no formal instruction.  I believe the phrase “self-taught” detracts.  Strike it and let your art speak for itself!

Technical Details:
Canon 5D Mark II, 300 f/4l + 1.4 tc, f/5.6, 1/800 sec.
Schramm State Recreation Area, Nebraska

Goodbye, Lincoln! Hello, Autofocus!


Technical Details:
Canon 5D Mark II, 17-40 f/4l @ 25mm, f/8, 1/320 sec., Singh-Ray Polarizing Filter

Last Friday was the last day of my exhibition at the Governor’s residence in Lincoln, Nebraska.  I loaded up the car and took the opportunity to capture the capitol building across the street.  Although, I live about 40 miles from the building, I have only captured a couple photos of the structure.  Beautifully designed by Bertram Grosvenor Goodhue and adorned with designs by Lee Lawrie (known previously for his work on 30 Rockefeller Plaza in New York and the LA Library), the building is rich with symbolism. 

As a secondary reason for photographing the capitol building, I wanted to test the autofocus on  my 17-40 f/4l lens which I had just received back from repair the previous day.  After testing the lens on both my 5D Mark II, and my 50D, I was happy to see that the autofocus was snappy and accurate.  Another pleased experience with Canon support (4 for 4 so far, Canon).  Here are some results from my session with the Nebraska State Capitol Building in Lincoln.

Photograph - Sowing the Seeds

This nearly 20 foot high statue was designed by Lee Lawrie who is known for works such as Atlas in Rockefeller Plaza and the Chapel at West Point. “The Sower” points northwesterly, the direction that would ecompoass the greatest amount of land in Nebraska. The dome, upon which “The Sower” stands, changes color depending on the weather. Here it is a golden color a result of the beautiful and warm day on which this image was captured.

Technical Details:
Canon 50D, 300 f/4l + 1.4tc, f/5.6, 1/400 sec.


Technical Details:
Canon 50D, 17-40 f/4l @ 17mm, f/7.1, 1/1000 sec.

Photograph - The Grand Capitol
Technical Details:
Canon 5D Mark II, 17-40 f/4l @ 22mm, f/9, 1/160 sec.

WordPress Appliance - Powered by TurnKey Linux